Program syllabus
Design, test, and ship guardrails that keep your AI assistants safe, compliant, and predictable — without grinding product velocity to a halt.
A short overview of the program: who it's for, what we cover, and how to get the most value out of it as a busy professional.
This can run as an intensive 2-day workshop or stretched over 3–4 weeks with async work in between.
Module 1
Module 2
Module 3
Module 4
Module 5
Capstone
Throughout the program, your team builds a concise guardrail design doc for one of your assistants. It captures threat models, policies, pipeline design, metrics, and incident playbooks. This becomes the artifact you can share with leadership, compliance, and future teammates.
We define what “safe enough” means for your assistants — in language that product, legal, and engineering can all live with.
We catalog how your assistants can go wrong: from hallucinated instructions, to data leakage, to subtle reputation damage. Then we rank those risks by likelihood and impact so you know where to start.
We co-author a light-weight threat model for one high-impact assistant, including:
This becomes the reference doc for both guardrail work and future product decisions.
We turn fuzzy concerns into concrete labels, rules, and examples your models can actually learn from.
Instead of giant policy PDFs nobody reads, we design lean policies tied directly to decisions: allow, block, escalate, or log. Then we define labels and examples that make those policies machine-readable.
We build a short, structured mapping from policy statements to labels, rules, and example prompts:
We design a concrete pipeline that sits alongside your assistants, not bolted on as an afterthought.
We treat safety as an ongoing test suite, not a one-time review before launch.
We show you how to turn messy ad-hoc red-teaming sessions into a repeatable process that generates durable test cases and data.
We assemble an initial golden set for one assistant, including:
We assume guardrails will eventually be stressed — and design how you’ll see it and respond when they are.
We create a reusable incident playbook for one representative failure scenario:
We usually run this as a focused engagement around one or two critical assistants. You bring real scenarios and constraints; we bring patterns, templates, and a shared language for safety.
By the end, you'll have a guardrail design doc, test sets, and monitoring plan your team can execute — without slowing product down.
This pairs especially well with AI Assistant Observability & SLOs and Advanced Retrieval Engineering for a production-grade AI reliability stack.